Difference between revisions of "Community/CaseStudies"

From Archivematica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
# If you don't already have one, [https://wiki.archivematica.org/Special:RequestAccount request a wiki account].
 
# If you don't already have one, [https://wiki.archivematica.org/Special:RequestAccount request a wiki account].
# Add a section by copying the template below.
+
# Add a section by editing this page and then copying the template below, replacing the placeholder text with your own.
 +
#
 +
 
 +
For more information on MediaWiki formatting, please see: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting
  
 
==Case study: Template Institution==
 
==Case study: Template Institution==
Line 12: Line 15:
 
Date added: 2018-07-16
 
Date added: 2018-07-16
  
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, eruditi apeirian gloriatur ut duo, regione impedit per ex. His lorem facer periculis et, est brute epicurei efficiendi cu, sea no iriure fabellas complectitur. Eum utinam omittam quaerendum id, ei delenit dolorem nam. Quem verear sed te. Qui no oblique invenire.
+
Case study page: [[Community/CaseStudies/TemplateInstitution]]

Revision as of 05:03, 16 July 2018

A place for institutions to describe their Archivematica deployments, share performance studies and describe their use cases and workflows.

Interested in contributing a case study to the wiki? Please follow these steps:

  1. If you don't already have one, request a wiki account.
  2. Add a section by editing this page and then copying the template below, replacing the placeholder text with your own.

For more information on MediaWiki formatting, please see: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting

Case study: Template Institution

Added by: Sara Allain

Date added: 2018-07-16

Case study page: Community/CaseStudies/TemplateInstitution