Difference between revisions of "Email preservation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr11-01 Preserving Email]] (DPC Technology Watch Report 11-01, ISSN 2048-7916, Digital Preservation Coalition 2011), Chris Prom, University of Illinois. | [http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr11-01 Preserving Email]] (DPC Technology Watch Report 11-01, ISSN 2048-7916, Digital Preservation Coalition 2011), Chris Prom, University of Illinois. | ||
*"In general, if an institution can get email into one of the MBOX or EML formats, it has taken a very big step on the road toward preserving email." (p.23) | *"In general, if an institution can get email into one of the MBOX or EML formats, it has taken a very big step on the road toward preserving email." (p.23) | ||
+ | *"XML conversion tools...can be very useful in achieving format neutrality. However, the author is aware of no general-purpose tools that are intended to facilitate the access, display, searching, or visualization of messages that have been migrated to XML. Until such tools have been developed – if they ever are – institutions will be forced to provide access to migrated messages using an email client of their choice or the user’s choice, recognizing that specific tools support different functionality." (p. 23) | ||
+ | |||
[[Category:Development documentation]] | [[Category:Development documentation]] |
Revision as of 13:46, 24 February 2012
Main Page > Development > Development documentation > Email preservation
These are requirements for email preservation in Archivematica:
- Preservation format
- Proprietary closed formats such as PST should be converted to open preservation format
- Preservation format should be text or xml based
- Email messages, calendars, contacts and other related entities should be normalized to the preservation format
- Preservation format should preserve the significant characteristics of the email messages
- Preservation format should be capable of being viewed as an access format or should be capable of generating an access format
- Attachments
- Attachments should be converted to preservation and access formats
- Converted attachments should retain links to emails to which they were attached
- Access format
- Access format should be human-readable and should be recognizable as email
- Access format should allow simple, intuitive navigation between messages, attachments, email boxes, contacts, calendars
- Access format should allow navigation to normalized access copies of attachments
Email preservation research
Preserving Email] (DPC Technology Watch Report 11-01, ISSN 2048-7916, Digital Preservation Coalition 2011), Chris Prom, University of Illinois.
- "In general, if an institution can get email into one of the MBOX or EML formats, it has taken a very big step on the road toward preserving email." (p.23)
- "XML conversion tools...can be very useful in achieving format neutrality. However, the author is aware of no general-purpose tools that are intended to facilitate the access, display, searching, or visualization of messages that have been migrated to XML. Until such tools have been developed – if they ever are – institutions will be forced to provide access to migrated messages using an email client of their choice or the user’s choice, recognizing that specific tools support different functionality." (p. 23)