Meeting 20110601

From Archivematica
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
= Chat log =
 
= Chat log =
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
 +
(10:35:54 AM) Joseph.p: Archivematica 0.7.1 is in feature freeze.
 +
Code freeze is scheduled for june 6th.
 +
 +
Joseph has been working on an access normalization path for mbox files. PST files are extracted to mbox format.
 +
Found a tool that can be used: hypermail
 +
 +
Currently dealing with the complication of readpst not appending extensions to mbox files.
 +
(10:37:03 AM) Jessica  Bushey: Who is taking Archivematica notes?
 +
(10:37:20 AM) Joseph.p: I could
 +
(10:37:23 AM) Joseph.p: I will
 +
(10:37:29 AM) Jessica  Bushey: thanks, i don't even know where they are listed.
 +
(10:37:49 AM) Sevein: 1 sec, I'm collecting? my news
 +
(10:41:08 AM) Sevein: - Jesús added validation to the manual normalization form.
 +
- Jesús finished the preservation planning report.
 +
- Jesús created the archival storage section which parses the static HTML file generated by storeAIP.py.
 +
- He made the status widget less eye-catching.
 +
- He updated upload-qubit.py so is easyer to debug when the upload fails.
 +
- Small improvements in the Ingest table layout to be adapted when the browser screen is narrow. 
 +
- He is working in the normalization report today.
 +
 +
(10:42:41 AM) Sevein: - Austin updated the Archivematica ppa to get the latest Django version, 1.3.x! I updated our development environment build script accordingly.
 +
(10:43:05 AM) Austin: thanks Sevein!
 +
(10:43:22 AM) Sevein: thank you!
 +
(10:43:32 AM) Austin: built a new readpst package, ended up using the binaries from the centOS x86 packages :/
 +
(10:43:41 AM) Austin: I think this will suffice for testing, however Im leaving the bug open until I can build for myself.
 +
(10:44:03 AM) Austin: did some post install package touch up for issue 532 and 331 
 +
(10:47:16 AM) Joseph.p: Austin, I seem to recall you saying you saw some slowness in your testing on the 'Sanitize file and directory names' micro service, I'm currently seeing that. I created an issue for it for myself to look into.
 +
(10:48:05 AM) Austin: yeah.. well on a sip with 1000 docs that needed to be sanatized(had spaces)  it just sat there for hours
 +
(10:48:29 AM) Joseph.p: something isn't right there
 +
(10:48:31 AM) David Juhasz: ouch
 +
(10:48:54 AM) Joseph.p: I'll poke it, and see what I come up with later
 +
(10:49:42 AM) Austin: cheers, if you want I can track down the file set I was using
 +
(10:49:44 AM) Joseph.p: that's it for dev?
 +
(10:49:50 AM) Austin: all for me
 +
(10:50:02 AM) Joseph.p: any doc news?
 +
(10:57:21 AM) Austin: yeah, ok sounds good
 +
(10:50:58 AM) Joseph.p: testing?
 +
(10:51:22 AM) Sevein: waiting for Evelyn!
 +
(10:51:39 AM) Joseph.p: OH I know...
 +
(10:51:56 AM) Sevein: I have been testing my last work, but we need the archivist point of view!
 +
(10:52:01 AM) Joseph.p: I guess this is deployment... added the new issue tracking statuses
 +
(10:52:27 AM) Joseph.p: QA-Review            = Issue is submitted to Quality Assurance for review/feedback/verification.
 +
QA-Feedback          = Quality Assurance has finished reviewing the issue, and has not deemed it closable.
 +
Document            = Issue is resolved, but wiki/documentation needs to be updated/created.
 +
(10:52:31 AM) Austin: thanks Joseph.p :]
 +
(10:53:14 AM) Joseph.p: Ok... anyone have anything to add?
 +
(10:54:02 AM) Sevein: mmmm Joseph.p, so when I want to close an issue, should I mark it as "QA-Review" or "Fixed"?
 +
(10:54:28 AM) Joseph.p: If you know for sure it's fixed, it goes to fixed
 +
(10:54:52 AM) Sevein: ok, I see
 +
(10:55:09 AM) Joseph.p: if you'd like a second set of eyes on it, QA-review, and owner=evelyn (or whomever)
 +
(10:55:43 AM) Sevein: ok
 +
(10:55:46 AM) Sevein: thank you :)
 +
(10:55:53 AM) Sevein: so we're done?ç
 +
(10:56:21 AM) Joseph.p: sometimes you may code something, and not know if that's exactly what evelyn/peter wants. Give it a QA review.
 +
(10:56:40 AM) Joseph.p: Austin, if you want us to test packages you've made, do it through QA review :)
 +
(10:56:48 AM) Joseph.p: make sense?
 +
(10:56:54 AM) Sevein: Joseph.p: yep, good idea.
 +
(10:57:11 AM) Austin: yeah, ok sounds good
 
</pre>
 
</pre>

Revision as of 14:01, 1 June 2011

Contents

Development

  • Joseph has been working on an access normalization path for mbox files. PST files are extracted to mbox format.
    • Found a tool that can be used: hypermail
  • Jesús finished the preservation planning report.
  • Jesús created the archival storage section which parses the static HTML file generated by storeAIP.py.
  • Jesús made the status widget less eye-catching.
  • Jesús updated upload-qubit.py so is easyer to debug when the upload fails.
  • Jesús made small improvements in the Ingest table layout to be adapted when the browser screen is narrow.
  • Jesús is working in the normalization report today.
  • Austin updated the Archivematica ppa to get the latest Django version, 1.3.x
  • Austin built a new readpst package, ended up using the binaries from the centOS x86 packages :/
    • this will suffice for testing, however Im leaving the bug open until I can build for myself.
  • Austin did some post install package touch up for issue 532 and 331

Deployment

Testing

Documentation

  • Added new issue tracking statuses:
    • QA-Review = Issue is submitted to Quality Assurance for review/feedback/verification.
    • QA-Feedback = Quality Assurance has finished reviewing the issue, and has not deemed it closable.
    • Document = Issue is resolved, but wiki/documentation needs to be updated/created.

Chat log

(10:35:54 AM) Joseph.p: Archivematica 0.7.1 is in feature freeze. 
Code freeze is scheduled for june 6th.

Joseph has been working on an access normalization path for mbox files. PST files are extracted to mbox format.
Found a tool that can be used: hypermail

Currently dealing with the complication of readpst not appending extensions to mbox files.
(10:37:03 AM) Jessica  Bushey: Who is taking Archivematica notes?
(10:37:20 AM) Joseph.p: I could
(10:37:23 AM) Joseph.p: I will
(10:37:29 AM) Jessica  Bushey: thanks, i don't even know where they are listed.
(10:37:49 AM) Sevein: 1 sec, I'm collecting? my news
(10:41:08 AM) Sevein: - Jesús added validation to the manual normalization form.
- Jesús finished the preservation planning report.
- Jesús created the archival storage section which parses the static HTML file generated by storeAIP.py.
- He made the status widget less eye-catching.
- He updated upload-qubit.py so is easyer to debug when the upload fails.
- Small improvements in the Ingest table layout to be adapted when the browser screen is narrow.  
- He is working in the normalization report today.

(10:42:41 AM) Sevein: - Austin updated the Archivematica ppa to get the latest Django version, 1.3.x! I updated our development environment build script accordingly.
(10:43:05 AM) Austin: thanks Sevein!
(10:43:22 AM) Sevein: thank you!
(10:43:32 AM) Austin: built a new readpst package, ended up using the binaries from the centOS x86 packages :/
(10:43:41 AM) Austin: I think this will suffice for testing, however Im leaving the bug open until I can build for myself.
(10:44:03 AM) Austin: did some post install package touch up for issue 532 and 331  
(10:47:16 AM) Joseph.p: Austin, I seem to recall you saying you saw some slowness in your testing on the 'Sanitize file and directory names' micro service, I'm currently seeing that. I created an issue for it for myself to look into.
(10:48:05 AM) Austin: yeah.. well on a sip with 1000 docs that needed to be sanatized(had spaces)  it just sat there for hours
(10:48:29 AM) Joseph.p: something isn't right there
(10:48:31 AM) David Juhasz: ouch
(10:48:54 AM) Joseph.p: I'll poke it, and see what I come up with later
(10:49:42 AM) Austin: cheers, if you want I can track down the file set I was using
(10:49:44 AM) Joseph.p: that's it for dev?
(10:49:50 AM) Austin: all for me
(10:50:02 AM) Joseph.p: any doc news?
(10:57:21 AM) Austin: yeah, ok sounds good
(10:50:58 AM) Joseph.p: testing?
(10:51:22 AM) Sevein: waiting for Evelyn!
(10:51:39 AM) Joseph.p: OH I know...
(10:51:56 AM) Sevein: I have been testing my last work, but we need the archivist point of view! 
(10:52:01 AM) Joseph.p: I guess this is deployment... added the new issue tracking statuses
(10:52:27 AM) Joseph.p: QA-Review            = Issue is submitted to Quality Assurance for review/feedback/verification.
QA-Feedback          = Quality Assurance has finished reviewing the issue, and has not deemed it closable.
Document             = Issue is resolved, but wiki/documentation needs to be updated/created.
(10:52:31 AM) Austin: thanks Joseph.p :]
(10:53:14 AM) Joseph.p: Ok... anyone have anything to add?
(10:54:02 AM) Sevein: mmmm Joseph.p, so when I want to close an issue, should I mark it as "QA-Review" or "Fixed"?
(10:54:28 AM) Joseph.p: If you know for sure it's fixed, it goes to fixed
(10:54:52 AM) Sevein: ok, I see
(10:55:09 AM) Joseph.p: if you'd like a second set of eyes on it, QA-review, and owner=evelyn (or whomever)
(10:55:43 AM) Sevein: ok
(10:55:46 AM) Sevein: thank you :)
(10:55:53 AM) Sevein: so we're done?ç
(10:56:21 AM) Joseph.p: sometimes you may code something, and not know if that's exactly what evelyn/peter wants. Give it a QA review.
(10:56:40 AM) Joseph.p: Austin, if you want us to test packages you've made, do it through QA review :)
(10:56:48 AM) Joseph.p: make sense?
(10:56:54 AM) Sevein: Joseph.p: yep, good idea.
(10:57:11 AM) Austin: yeah, ok sounds good
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox