Difference between revisions of "Directory printer for recording original order"

From Archivematica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
*Add open-source directory printer to Archivematica
 
*Add open-source directory printer to Archivematica
**[https://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ Tesseract] is the most actively developed; other open-source OCR is either moribund (Cuneiform, OCRopus) or released only sporadically without major improvements (OCRad, gOCR).
 
**The actively-developed options are:
 
***[https://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/ Tesseract] - Very actively developed. Best accuracy of all the open-source options, good speed.
 
***[http://www.gnu.org/software/ocrad/ OCRad] - Moderate-to-poor accuracy, excellent speed.
 
***[http://jocr.sourceforge.net/ gOCR] - Poor accuracy, slow speed.
 
**Tesseract appears to be the best solution in most cases. If speed was paramount and mediocre or poor accuracy would be acceptable, there might be an argument to use OCRad.
 
 
*Add micro-service to generate tree diagram for a transfer
 
*Add micro-service to generate tree diagram for a transfer
 
**Micro-service: 'Print directory'
 
**Micro-service: 'Print directory'

Revision as of 21:03, 27 March 2014

Main Page > Development > Development documentation > Directory printer for recording original order

Requirements

See related issues:

  • #6257

Add directory printer to generate tree diagram

  • Add open-source directory printer to Archivematica
  • Add micro-service to generate tree diagram for a transfer
    • Micro-service: 'Print directory'
    • Choose yes or no in dropdown menu

https://projects.artefactual.com/issues/

  • Add tree diagram to submissionDocumentation directory
    • xml or txt
  • Add configuration setting to the administration tab of the dashboard to pre-select tree diagram option