Difference between revisions of "Improvements/Avalon"

From Archivematica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added notes about things to observe now that Archivematica has been deployed)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with [http://www.avalonmediasystem.org/ Avalon].
 
This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with [http://www.avalonmediasystem.org/ Avalon].
 +
 +
== Project Thesis ==
 +
 +
Artefactual and Avalon will seek to create:
 +
 +
* support for activities such as file characterization and preservation metadata extraction:
 +
** digitized and born-digital AV materials.
 +
* Integration with Archivematica or its components into Avalon ingestion workflows to provide:
 +
** preservation metadata
 +
** better packaging for long-term digital preservation activities
  
 
== Questions ==
 
== Questions ==
 +
 +
=== METS ===
  
 
* Is it required that the metadata in the batch ingest manifest is represented in the AIP METS file (in dmdSecs for example?)
 
* Is it required that the metadata in the batch ingest manifest is represented in the AIP METS file (in dmdSecs for example?)
Line 12: Line 24:
 
** Or is describing the presence and use of structure files sufficient?
 
** Or is describing the presence and use of structure files sufficient?
 
* How should the presence of caption files be noted in the METS?
 
* How should the presence of caption files be noted in the METS?
 +
 +
=== Exploration of Archivematica ===
 +
 +
* Progress and first impressions
 +
* Ingest progress
 +
* Exploration of the AIP generated from Avalon Batch Packages
 +
* Immediate observations:
 +
** Workflow questions
 +
** Perceived or real gaps
 +
** Questions Artefactual can answer about what Archivematica is doing/should be doing
 +
* Relationship between Archivematica and Avalon, e.g position in workflow, pre-Avalon? post-Avalon? Something else?

Revision as of 20:04, 7 March 2018

This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with Avalon.

Project Thesis

Artefactual and Avalon will seek to create:

  • support for activities such as file characterization and preservation metadata extraction:
    • digitized and born-digital AV materials.
  • Integration with Archivematica or its components into Avalon ingestion workflows to provide:
    • preservation metadata
    • better packaging for long-term digital preservation activities

Questions

METS

  • Is it required that the metadata in the batch ingest manifest is represented in the AIP METS file (in dmdSecs for example?)
  • Will users have a need to populate the batch ingest manifest with metadata entered into Archivematica?
    • Descriptive metadata?
    • Rights metadata?
  • When Avalon is being used to disseminate different quality files, which file(s) should be stored in the AIP?
    • How should mulitple versions be modeled in the METS?
  • Should the structure of files be modeled in the METS when structure XML files are included?
    • Or is describing the presence and use of structure files sufficient?
  • How should the presence of caption files be noted in the METS?

Exploration of Archivematica

  • Progress and first impressions
  • Ingest progress
  • Exploration of the AIP generated from Avalon Batch Packages
  • Immediate observations:
    • Workflow questions
    • Perceived or real gaps
    • Questions Artefactual can answer about what Archivematica is doing/should be doing
  • Relationship between Archivematica and Avalon, e.g position in workflow, pre-Avalon? post-Avalon? Something else?
Retrieved from "https://wiki.archivematica.org/index.php?title=Improvements/Avalon&oldid=12284"