Difference between revisions of "Improvements/Avalon"
(Created page with "This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with [http://www.avalonmediasystem.org/ Avalon]. == Questions ==") |
m |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with [http://www.avalonmediasystem.org/ Avalon]. | This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with [http://www.avalonmediasystem.org/ Avalon]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Project Thesis == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Artefactual and Avalon will seek to create: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * support for activities such as file characterization and preservation metadata extraction: | ||
+ | ** digitized and born-digital AV materials. | ||
+ | * Integration with Archivematica or its components into Avalon ingestion workflows to provide: | ||
+ | ** preservation metadata | ||
+ | ** better packaging for long-term digital preservation activities | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Use Cases == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === In scope === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Two clear use-cases based on previous discussion (up to 8 March 2018), for which we can focus on and keep scope narrow. These are: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Avalon first | ||
+ | ** Process in Avalon and then send the package to Archivematica to generate an AIP | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Questions''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Do we ignore the Fedora metadata entirely? | ||
+ | - Do we transfer Fedora metadata as a digital object, but perform no special conversion mapping | ||
+ | - Out-of-scope: Mapping/cross-walk to try and see Fedora metadata mapped into Archivematica | ||
+ | |||
+ | * AM first | ||
+ | ** Collection of assets described in a batch manifest and they are processed and then picked up by Avalon | ||
+ | |||
+ | Two useful phrasings, that could be considered nuances on these, that came from the same meeting: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * ''As an user of Avalon send the output of a project to a repository and have institutional digital preservation policies applied to that collectionffor long-term preservation'' | ||
+ | * ''As a preservation specialist, in a catastrophic scenario, be able to round-trip from AM back into an instance of Avalon''** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **'''NB''' Recognised that there is no hard-requirement to round-trip back into Avalon from Archivematica, though it was noted that it would be possible to learn quite a lot. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Out of scope === | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Versioning''' | ||
+ | This is a very broad summary, but because of the potential for work to continue being completed on a 'unit' in Avalon, data will become out of date, and there may be a wish to see that updated in Archivematica. This is one example of where data might need updating or to be re-versioned. Others: | ||
+ | * AIP Update following updated in Avalon | ||
+ | * Data supplied as an asset to Avalon/Archivematica, e.g. VTT Subtitle Information, (addition of other languages/corrections, etc.) | ||
+ | * Other cases | ||
+ | |||
+ | == What do we need? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Northwest to work with Sarah to discuss use-cases | ||
+ | * Do we need more sample files/batches of data? | ||
+ | * Understand the current transfer issue being experienced with the initial setup - In progress. | ||
== Questions == | == Questions == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === METS === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Is it required that the metadata in the batch ingest manifest is represented in the AIP METS file (in dmdSecs for example?) | ||
+ | * Will users have a need to populate the batch ingest manifest with metadata entered into Archivematica? | ||
+ | ** Descriptive metadata? | ||
+ | ** Rights metadata? | ||
+ | * When Avalon is being used to disseminate different quality files, which file(s) should be stored in the AIP? | ||
+ | ** How should mulitple versions be modeled in the METS? | ||
+ | * Should the structure of files be modeled in the METS when structure XML files are included? | ||
+ | ** Or is describing the presence and use of structure files sufficient? | ||
+ | * How should the presence of caption files be noted in the METS? | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Exploration of Archivematica === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Progress and first impressions | ||
+ | * Ingest progress | ||
+ | * Exploration of the AIP generated from Avalon Batch Packages | ||
+ | * Immediate observations: | ||
+ | ** Workflow questions | ||
+ | ** Perceived or real gaps | ||
+ | ** Questions Artefactual can answer about what Archivematica is doing/should be doing | ||
+ | * Relationship between Archivematica and Avalon, e.g position in workflow, pre-Avalon? post-Avalon? Something else? |
Latest revision as of 19:50, 8 March 2018
This page will document potential areas of improvement in Archivematica that will allow for better workflows with Avalon.
Project Thesis[edit]
Artefactual and Avalon will seek to create:
- support for activities such as file characterization and preservation metadata extraction:
- digitized and born-digital AV materials.
- Integration with Archivematica or its components into Avalon ingestion workflows to provide:
- preservation metadata
- better packaging for long-term digital preservation activities
Use Cases[edit]
In scope[edit]
Two clear use-cases based on previous discussion (up to 8 March 2018), for which we can focus on and keep scope narrow. These are:
- Avalon first
- Process in Avalon and then send the package to Archivematica to generate an AIP
Questions
- Do we ignore the Fedora metadata entirely? - Do we transfer Fedora metadata as a digital object, but perform no special conversion mapping - Out-of-scope: Mapping/cross-walk to try and see Fedora metadata mapped into Archivematica
- AM first
- Collection of assets described in a batch manifest and they are processed and then picked up by Avalon
Two useful phrasings, that could be considered nuances on these, that came from the same meeting:
- As an user of Avalon send the output of a project to a repository and have institutional digital preservation policies applied to that collectionffor long-term preservation
- As a preservation specialist, in a catastrophic scenario, be able to round-trip from AM back into an instance of Avalon**
- NB Recognised that there is no hard-requirement to round-trip back into Avalon from Archivematica, though it was noted that it would be possible to learn quite a lot.
Out of scope[edit]
Versioning This is a very broad summary, but because of the potential for work to continue being completed on a 'unit' in Avalon, data will become out of date, and there may be a wish to see that updated in Archivematica. This is one example of where data might need updating or to be re-versioned. Others:
- AIP Update following updated in Avalon
- Data supplied as an asset to Avalon/Archivematica, e.g. VTT Subtitle Information, (addition of other languages/corrections, etc.)
- Other cases
What do we need?[edit]
- Northwest to work with Sarah to discuss use-cases
- Do we need more sample files/batches of data?
- Understand the current transfer issue being experienced with the initial setup - In progress.
Questions[edit]
METS[edit]
- Is it required that the metadata in the batch ingest manifest is represented in the AIP METS file (in dmdSecs for example?)
- Will users have a need to populate the batch ingest manifest with metadata entered into Archivematica?
- Descriptive metadata?
- Rights metadata?
- When Avalon is being used to disseminate different quality files, which file(s) should be stored in the AIP?
- How should mulitple versions be modeled in the METS?
- Should the structure of files be modeled in the METS when structure XML files are included?
- Or is describing the presence and use of structure files sufficient?
- How should the presence of caption files be noted in the METS?
Exploration of Archivematica[edit]
- Progress and first impressions
- Ingest progress
- Exploration of the AIP generated from Avalon Batch Packages
- Immediate observations:
- Workflow questions
- Perceived or real gaps
- Questions Artefactual can answer about what Archivematica is doing/should be doing
- Relationship between Archivematica and Avalon, e.g position in workflow, pre-Avalon? post-Avalon? Something else?