Meeting 20121031 - Revision history

Evelyn: /* Documentation */

2012-10-31T17:58:23Z

Documentation

Evelyn: /* chat log */

2012-10-31T17:58:01Z

chat log

Evelyn: /* Deployment */

2012-10-31T17:55:33Z

Deployment

Evelyn: /* Testing */

2012-10-31T17:54:17Z

Testing

Evelyn: /* Development */

2012-10-31T17:53:49Z

Development

Evelyn at 17:46, 31 October 2012

2012-10-31T17:46:46Z

Evelyn: /* Development */

2012-10-31T17:42:22Z

Development

Evelyn at 17:41, 31 October 2012

2012-10-31T17:41:30Z

Evelyn: Created page with "Artefactual Systems, Internal Archivematica Dev Mtg, 2012-10-31 = Development = * Courtney mocked up Advanced AIP Search: Advanced_AIP_index_search * Joseph has been wor..."

2012-10-31T17:34:44Z

Created page with "Artefactual Systems, Internal Archivematica Dev Mtg, 2012-10-31 = Development = * Courtney mocked up Advanced AIP Search: Advanced_AIP_index_search * Joseph has been wor..."

New page

Artefactual Systems, Internal Archivematica Dev Mtg, 2012-10-31

= Development =

* Courtney mocked up Advanced AIP Search: [[Advanced_AIP_index_search]]
* Joseph has been working on implementing the normalization based on file identification tool workflows
* Courtney completed [[Transfer_backlog_requirements]]
* Evelyn has been working on requirements for [[TRIM_exports]]

= Deployment =

* Austin has been working on multiple VM deployment for distributed processing

= Testing =

= Documentation =

=chat log=

<pre>
<courtney> and created associated issues
<berwin22> I have been making great headway on implementing the normalization based on file identification tool workflows.
<courtney> hooooray
<courtney> maybe not the having the meeting was a good thing?
<berwin22> I'll be away next week.
<peterVG> berwin22: okay, glad to hear it. re: progress
<courtney> i've completed Transfer backlog requirements with mockups as well: https://www.archivematica.org/wiki/Transfer_backlog_requirements
<peterVG> berwin22: we can discuss outstanding issues and options tomorrow or Fri
<epmclellan1> I've been working with CVA on TRIM export requirements: https://www.archivematica.org/wiki/TRIM_exports
<epmclellan1> which I think will have to be VanDocs export requirements, they're not really generic
<berwin22> Friday may be better, tomorrow I may be away.
<peterVG> okay, great. so for sure on Fri.
<courtney> that means I'll work from home tomorrow, come in fri
<berwin22> thanks courtney
<epmclellan1> I'll be at home on Friday, hope that's ok
<peterVG> i'll get debrief from you and we'll plan next steps for when you get back in Nov
<epmclellan1> it's in the calendar
<courtney> i'll need to update the create sip mockup a bit and sort of "reactivate" those issues so we have time to qa when mike's got something for us
<peterVG> epmclellan1: np, joseph and I can chat. I can always follow-up with you and courtney the week after or when berwin22 gets back
<epmclellan1> sounds good
<courtney> peterVG: i'll be here for it
<epmclellan1> thanks
<peterVG> courtney: okay, good
<courtney> peterVG: i may have to do a lot of the dirty work
<peterVG> okay, looking forward to all file mucking details
<courtney> peterVG, epmclellan1 it may be a good idea for us to quickly sit down tomorrow for maybe 1/2 hour about AM dev
<epmclellan1> sure
<peterVG> okay, np
<courtney> any more dev? mcantelon?
<courtney> oh, actually, wondering if i can hand an issue to fiver
<mcantelon> I was tied up last with with UBC DIP support and CVA stuff, so no, alas.
<fiver> courtney: what's the issue?
<courtney> http://code.google.com/p/archivematica/issues/detail?id=1122
<courtney> fiver: might give you some practice with AM
<fiver> hm, relates a lot to the current roundtrip work. sure.
<courtney> anyone opposed to this idea? peterVG, epmclellan1, JessicaB
<epmclellan1> sounds like a good idea to me
<JessicaB> no i think that was Peter's plan.
<courtney> hm, can't assign it to him in AM issues list
<peterVG> issue 1122 not loading for me
<peterVG> but yes, plan was to include Dan in Archivematica QA as well
<JessicaB> not loading for me either
<peterVG> so if that is a good transition issue, please go ahead
<courtney> it's mapping md from am to atom
<peterVG> perfect
<peterVG> googlecode not loading for me
<epmclellan1> me neither
<mcantelon> Weird, works for me.
<peterVG> i believe evelyn is an admin, she can add dan@artefactual.com to group?
<peterVG> when its back up?
<courtney> cool, i added fiver to the list of owners in the AM issues list
<courtney> peterVG: i already did
<peterVG> there you go!
<fiver> creating asana task now - should i put this under AM dev or AM community support in Asana?
<courtney> AM dev
<courtney> mcantelon: will you have time to go over some of the new mockups/issues today?
<fiver> thx - task made - added epmclellan1 as follower...
<mcantelon> courtney: Sure... only thing I have scheduled is a 1 PM meeting with CVA.
<mcantelon> (phone meeting)
<courtney> cool
<JessicaB> fiver: can you add me to the followers on your Asana task, so that I can stay in the loop over this critical component between the two systesm
<courtney> me too, por favor
<fiver> JessicaB: courtney: done
<JessicaB> thnx
<courtney> moving on from dev?
<epmclellan1> ARTi: how is CVA vm deployment coming along?
<epmclellan1> hmm, nm
<ARTi> epmclellan1: good, touched base with tuan yesturday about configuration.. just waiting for network info back
<epmclellan1> ah, thanks
<ARTi> Ive mostly been working on deployment
<ARTi> sfu/ubc/cvan all want the new stuff ^_^
<epmclellan1> they want the hottest new Archivematica vms
<peterVG> so idea there is to get MCP server with 3 processing client VMs configured and we pump through previous CVA SIPs and try to gauge how much throughput speed improvements we see
<ARTi> peterVG: yep, thats the plan
<peterVG> So epmclellan1 can you follow-up and line-up test SIPs
<courtney> ALL of the SIPs?
<epmclellan1> using CVA's stuff?
<peterVG> no, we're just testing for performance improvement right now
<epmclellan1> ah, ok
<peterVG> but we do want the same data to compare against
<peterVG> so a subset of already ingested SIPs
<epmclellan1> ok, I'll talk to Sue
<courtney> testing?
<courtney> i've been doing qa catchup, just a few outstanding that i'll need clarification from the folks who assigned them to me
<epmclellan1> nothing from me this week
<courtney> i'll send direct msgs to those involved.
<epmclellan1> on to docs?
<courtney> i got nuthin'
<epmclellan1> likewise
<berwin22> nothing
<fiver> niet....
<fiver> Non-sequitur: not sure exactly how, but we should aim for AM to be on this list next year, after 1.x release... http://www.dpconline.org/newsroom/latest-news/934-dpc-member-vote-for-digital-preservation-awards-2012
<courtney> i have an issue to document dip structure, do we think that's necessary still?
<courtney> fiver: i like the idea, but i think it's hard when you're a "vendor"
<courtney> i think they like to give prizes to projects
<berwin22> I would say yes, if people plan to create DIPS for different systems by altering the archivematica dip
<mcantelon> fiver: Nice!
<courtney> even though we consider ourselves, in a lot of ways, a project
<epmclellan1> courtney: it would be a good idea to have DIP structure documented on the wiki
</pre>

[[Category:meetings]]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 = Documentation =
-* courtney made a DIP structure page on the wiki: https://www.archivematica.org/wiki/DIP_structure
+* Courtney made a DIP structure page on the wiki: https://www.archivematica.org/wiki/DIP_structure
 =chat log=

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 <pre>
+(10:34:41 AM) djjuhasz: Archivematica, you have the floor
 </pre>
 [[Category:meetings]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 31 October 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	* Dan tested AM metadata mapping on export to AtoM, and created issue 1268 and issue 1269 in response to some issues encountered with language and date fields		* Dan tested AM metadata mapping on export to AtoM, and created issue 1268 and issue 1269 in response to some issues encountered with language and date fields
		+	* Courtney has been testing DIP upload and doing QA on outstanding issues

	= Documentation =		= Documentation =

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Mike G has been working on the FPR. He got it displaying the tables and such, basic search was working but there's a minor bug in it he just noticed this morning. He hasn't gotten the individual fields/boolean combinations stuff done yet
 * Courtney updated a lot of mockups and made sure that there were issues for all of the requirements for transfer backlog, create sip
 = Deployment =

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * Mike C changed the Archivematica dev scripts to pull AtoM from Git
 * Mike G has been working on the FPR. He got it displaying the tables and such, basic search was working but there's a minor bug in it he just noticed this morning. He hasn't gotten the individual fields/boolean combinations stuff done yet
 = Deployment =

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 = Deployment =
-* Austin has been working on multiple VM deployment for distributed processing
+* Austin has been working on multi-node install on Windows VM for a client
 = Testing =

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 = Development =
-* Courtney mocked up Advanced AIP Search: [[Advanced_AIP_index_search]]
+* Joseph has been working away on using PUIDs for normalization
-* Joseph has been working on implementing the normalization based on file identification tool workflows
+* Evelyn supplied a list of PUIDs from PRONOM that link to existing normalization rules in Archivematica
-* Courtney completed [[Transfer_backlog_requirements]]
+* Mike C changed the Archivematica dev scripts to pull AtoM from Git
-* Evelyn has been working on requirements for [[TRIM_exports]]
+* Mike G has been working on the FPR. He got it displaying the tables and such, basic search was working but there's a minor bug in it he just noticed this morning. He hasn't gotten the individual fields/boolean combinations stuff done yet
 = Deployment =
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 <pre>
-<courtney> and created associated issues
 </pre>
 [[Category:meetings]]